Independent judgement for decision safety.
Independent judgement for decision safety.
Request an assessment.
This is an independent assessment of whether your current product metrics and behavioural signals can safely support the decisions being made.
Reaching out allows an initial read: confirm the decision context, set a responsible scope, and identify the minimum evidence required for a defensible judgement.
Assessment-only. Implementation, execution, and ongoing analytics ownership remain internal.
Send a short note with enough context to identify the decision owner and what is being decided. If you are forwarding this internally, the same note can be used as the internal ask.
If you’re unsure what matters, include what you have. Scoping exists to prevent unnecessary work.
- The decision being made (or the decision that keeps stalling).
- Who owns that decision.
- Which metrics/signals are being relied on.
- What feels off (contradiction, drift, disagreement, loss of meaning).
- Any upcoming change that increases scrutiny (scale, review, audit, migration, leadership transition).
Scoping is used to define a bounded assessment: what is being judged, what evidence is required, and what will be delivered.
After scope is agreed, work usually completes within weeks rather than months. The engagement completes when the written assessment artefact is delivered.
- Deliverable is a written assessment artefact (judgement, assumptions, interpretive dependencies, failure modes).
- Inputs are minimal and determined during scoping (definitions, dashboards as evidence, telemetry descriptions, decision context).
- Outputs are descriptive rather than prescriptive, written to be defensible under scrutiny.
- Implementation ownership and accountability remain internal.